Historically, among the differences of the Louisiana Code from the common law is the role of property rights among women, particularly in inheritance acquired by widows.  The law of India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh is largely based on English common law due to the long period of British colonial influence during the time of the British Raj. Israel has a common law system. Its basic principles are derived from the law of the British Mandate of Palestine and are therefore similar to those of British and American law, namely: the role of the courts in the creation of the body of law and the authority of the Supreme Court in the review and, where appropriate, the annulment of legislative and executive decisions, as well as in the application of the adversarial system. One of the main reasons why israel`s constitution remains unwritten is the fear of each ruling party that the creation of a written constitution, combined with elements of the common law, would severely limit the powers of the Knesset (which has almost unlimited power under the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty).  Prior to 1938, federal courts, like almost all other common law courts, ruled on any matter on which the competent legislature (either the U.S. Congress or the state legislature, depending on the question) had not acted by appealing to the courts of the same system, that is, other federal courts, even on questions of constitutional law. and even when there was no explicit grant of powers by Congress or the Constitution. The states of Delaware, Illinois, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Tennessee continued to divide the statutory and registry courts, such as the Delaware Court of Chancery.
In New Jersey, the courts of appeal are united, but the trial courts are organized into a division of opportunity and a division of law. After partition, Pakistan maintained its common law system.  In common law jurisdictions, almost all cases that constitute a bona fide disagreement about the law are resolved in a written statement. The legal justification for the decision, known as the ratio decidendi, not only determines the court`s judgment between the parties, but also sets a precedent for the settlement of future disputes. On the other hand, civil law decisions generally do not contain explanatory opinions, so there is no precedent from one decision to another.  In common law systems, a single case decided is as binding as a statute or regulation under the principle of stare decisis. On the other hand, individual decisions in civil law systems have only an advisory and non-binding effect. In civil law systems, case law gains weight only when a long series of cases uses a coherent reasoning called case law constant. Civil lawyers consult case law to get their best prediction of how a court will decide, but in comparison, civil judges are less likely to follow it. Another well-known example of common law is one that refers to patient and physician confidentiality.
The legal concept means that information about the patient`s state of health, the patient`s treatment, medical opinion or medical records is private and secret. The physician does not have the right to disclose such details about his patient to others. The U.S. federal government (as opposed to the states) has a variant of a common law system. U.S. federal courts act only as interpreters of laws and the Constitution, precisely drafting and defining broad legal language (connotation 1 (b) above), but unlike state courts, they do not act as an independent source of common law. The common law was imported into the United States by English settlers. However, over time, the country has developed a diverse legal system in which multiple sources contribute to the legislation. In addition to the common law, other sources of jurisprudence are constitutional law and statutory law. Civil law is also practised at the State level. Ghana did not abolish the common law system inherited from the British after independence, and today it is enshrined in the country`s 1992 constitution.
Chapter Four of the Ghanaian Constitution, entitled “The Laws of Ghana”, contains in Article 11(1) the list of laws in force in the State. This includes (a) the Constitution; (b) Decrees issued by or under the authority of the Parliament established by the Constitution; (c) orders, rules and regulations made by a person or authority under a power conferred by the Constitution; (d) applicable law; and (e) the common law.  Thus, Ghana`s modern constitution, like its predecessor, adopted English customary law by anchoring it in its provisions. The doctrine of judicial primacy, based on the principle of stare decisis as applied in England and other common law countries, also applies to Ghana. Edward Coke, Lord Chief Justice of the English Court of Common Pleas of the 17th century and Member of Parliament, wrote several legal texts that brought together and incorporated centuries of jurisprudence. Lawyers in England and America learned the law from its institutes and reports until the end of the 18th century. His works are still cited by common law courts around the world. The age-old authority of the common law courts in England to develop the law on a case-by-case basis and apply the law of law – “legislation from the judiciary” – is a traditional function of the courts, which has been transferred to the American system as part of the “judicial power” set out in Article III of the US Constitution.  Judge Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. .